[Q] SRC/P intelligent RAID control card?
Dave Garrison - Systems Engineer
David.Garrison@west.sun.com
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:12:08 -0800 (PST)
If I understand what you said correctly, you would get SRC/P control only
in the top 8 drive bays. The E450 has 5 uscsi channels. Starting from
the bottom drive bays: the first 4 bays are controlled by the built in
scsi controller; the next 8 (2 sets of 4) are controlled by (in your
case) the "regular" scsi controller; and the top 8 would be under the
SRC/P control.
The add-on scsi controllers (whether h/w or s/w raid) are dual channel
scsi controllers w/2 cables; each cable connects to one half of each
backplane, or 4 disk bays. (Each add-on backplane supports 8 drives.)
So there is a 1 controller card to 1 backplane relationship. To support
16 drives (both add-on backplanes) w/ h/w raid you need 2 of these
scsi controllers. (I am only referring to the internal disk bays here,
not external drive support.)
HTH,
Dave
> X-Authentication-Warning: dns.eng.auburn.edu: majordom set sender to
owner-ssa-managers@Eng.Auburn.Edu using -f
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:00:43 -0500 (EST)
> From: L <leed@chele.cais.net>
> To: ssa-managers@Eng.Auburn.EDU
> Subject: [Q] SRC/P intelligent RAID control card?
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Info: To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe ssa-managers' to majordomo@Eng.Auburn.EDU in message
body
>
>
> We have SUN E450 witn Solaris 2.7 installed. The computer have three
> backplanes. first and second backplane use regular SCSI control card and
> third backplane(top) use SRC/P intelligent control card. Currently, there
> have 9 internal HD(id 0-8). I installed the intelligent RAID software and
> run "dptmgr", their has icon "hba0" display and NO hard disk associate to it.
> I call SUN support engineer, he told me SRC/P can only work with HD
> connect to it(it mean each backplane need SRC/P control card). I saw the
> document mention SRC/P can control 16 internal
> HD and 36 external HD. If it is true, why SRC/P can NOT find another
> backplane HD?
>
>
> Can anyone confirm that?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>