Different versions of VxVM for one SSA
Roy Alexander
roya@iex.com
Wed, 11 Jun 1997 14:39:37 -0500
Is it possible and safe to manage one SSA with two different versions
of Volume Manager?
Here is my current setup:
host_a
-------------
| OS 2.4 |
| |-------
| VM 2.1.1 | | -------------
------------- |----| SSA 102 |
host_b | |
------------- |----| FW 3.9 |
| OS 2.4 | | -------------
| |-------
| VM 2.1.1 |
-------------
One host is active and the other is a hot standby. Only one
host "owns" the SSA at a time by import/deport of the single
disk group on the SSA.
We are moving to a more fault tolerant setup with two new
SSAs and each host connected to both SSAs. Since this system
is online 24x7, we must upgrade each host separately. As a
first step, we plan to move to this setup:
host_a
------------- -------------
| OS 2.4 | | SSA 102 |
| |-----------| |
| VM 2.1.1 | | FW 3.9 |
------------- -------------
host_b
------------- -------------
| OS 2.5.1 |-----------| SSA 112 |
| | | |
| VM 2.3 |---- | FW 3.11 |
------------- | -------------
|
| -------------
| | SSA 112 |
|-------| |
| FW 3.11 |
-------------
The real question is could host_b with the newer OS and VM
manage the old SSA 102 if some unforeseen problem arose with
the new SSA 112s AND host_a died (failover to host_b)?
If so, what would be required for host_b to "forget" the two SSA
112s and "learn" about the SSA 102?
We will run in this mixed configuration for a couple of days until
we are sure there are no problems with the new SSAs, OS, and VxVM.
During this evaluation period, I wanted to understand what my options
were for this double fail scenario.
TIA,
Roy Alexander
________________________________________________________________________
Roy Alexander | "If you're going to write bad code,
roya@iex.com | do it in someone else's language!"
IEX Corp. | Bjarne Stroustrup -- creator of C++